Thursday, February 19, 2015

Teaching Backwards


I believe chapter one of the UBD reading to be the most insightful reading regarding teaching for me. At first I didn’t understand what exactly UBD meant, until reading further as it clarified the “understanding by design”. Through this reading, I believe understanding by design concerns how to get students to understand the content by a unique instructional design/approach. The instructional design this chapter refers to is the “backward design”.  As a future teacher, I was eager  to learn about how there are different ways to go about an “assessment” that differs from the traditional “teach and end instruction with assessment”. With this backwards design, it helps the teacher gain insight on what the student already knows and sharpening the teacher's focus from there by framing their unit or course on how to get one’s students from what they already know to what the teacher wants their students to gain an “understanding” of by the time the unit or course comes to a close.
As this chapter gives insight on a backwards approach towards assessing and teaching, it continued to explain different sorts of assessment methods that I found helpful. Instead of relying on a pre assessment and an assessment at the end of a unit, this chapter offered a “continuum of assessment methods” ranging from an easy understanding of students by “informal checks for understanding” to a more complex understanding required from students through “performance tasks and projects”, and all of these various types of assessments are to be thought of as a collection of evidence.
Lastly, I found it interesting that this chapter not only explains the backward design approach while offering insight on assessment methods, this chapter also explains how a teacher can “organize” what is worthy of understanding. In example, the chapter offers a framework of what the teacher should organize its content into: “worth being familiar with”, “important to know and do”, and “enduring understanding”. The “worth being familiar with” and the “important to know and do” can be viewed as “pre-requisites". The enduring understanding is the “big idea”—it is what the teacher hopes the student will take with them beyond the classroom.
            This chapter gives a unique and helpful insight on organizing instruction. It departs from traditional instruction that I view to be "lecture and test at the end of course" by instead offering a design that appears to be beneficial for student learning and understanding.

4 comments:

  1. I agree with you about the assessment. I grew up with the same structure of content, then assessment at the end. Its a great idea that we can assess as we teach the content to see if the students are understanding the unit. Or if we have to change the plan a little. You talk about the lecture and test method. There are students who still prefer this method. Is there anything truly wrong with this style? I'm certainly not one of those people who enjoy lecture and exam. That is so boring to me. I don't really grasp any of the information.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think it depends how it is done for every method and I'm sure designing lessons 'backwards' will be as much a process as any other method.

      "Lecture and test" don't necessarily have to go together in one breath but I'm beginning to think I must be one of the luckiest students ever since I seem to have had excellent lecturers and learned very well from them. If I had to go through elementary or high school today, I doubt I would fare even remotely as well as I did.

      Delete
  2. Hi Caroline,

    I like this organization idea too, but I wonder if you actually "plan" things that are only 'worth being familiar with' or is that the leftover bin -- for stuff that isn't enduring or important enough to spend a lot of time on.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think you have a really great grasp of understanding in UBD as well as the continuum of assessment they mention. One thing that stood out to me about understanding that you hadn't mentioned here was that it wont' always be one "right" answer. What we want at the end is not a neat answer written on an exam. But rather we want to know our students have an understanding of how to interact with the content and apply in other areas/life. It's a much more complicated system now like you said that is not simply relay information and have students regurgitate it on a summative assessment.

    ReplyDelete